awardsshopping
homespecialfunnostalgia
Boomers
Features
Mission
Boomer Women
Boomer Men
Dr SUSE Is In
Boomer Biz
Business News
Single Boomers
Empowering Caregivers
Dr. Guilfoyle
About Boomers
Boomers Team
 
Internet
Community
BraveNet Chat
Bulletin Board
Boomers Forum
Yahoo Club
FIRETALK Chat
TalkCIty Chat
Open Forum!
Member
Homepages

Advertisers
 


    UN Opposes US Stem Cell Ban

    Reuters - Fri Nov 7, 4:55 PM ET A U.N. tradition of seeking broad international consensus in the drafting of treaties has set back a Bush administration campaign for a global ban on medical research on stem Washington, with backing from the U.S. anti-abortion movement, tried to push a resolution through a U.N committee on Thursday for the drafting of a treaty that would ban both the cloning of human beings and so-called "therapeutic" cloning, in which human cells are cloned for medical research. Cloning research relies on embryo cells, or stem cells, because they can grow into all cells and tissues in the body. While there is virtually universal support at the United Nations (news - web sites) for a treaty banning human cloning, the international community is deeply divided over therapeutic cloning. Scientists see it as a promising avenue in the battle against disease while anti-abortion activists and many Catholics see it as the taking of human lives. Nigerian envoy Felix Awanbor said his country hoped for a ban on stem cell studies for fear African women were "most likely to be at risk as easy targets to source the billions of embryos required for scientific experimentation on this issue." While the United States claimed support for its approach from as many as 100 of the 191 U.N. member-nations, an ad hoc group of governments managed to block it in the General Assembly's legal committee on a razor-thin vote of 80 to 79 with 15 abstentions. The vote was on a motion -- put forward by Iran on behalf of the 57-nation Organization of the Islamic Conference -- to defer consideration of the drafting of a treaty on cloning until 2005. Those voting in favor of the delay said they did so for a number of reasons, but most stressed the need for consensus on such divisive issues. One group of countries opposed to the U.S. stand, led by Belgium and including Brazil, Japan, South Africa and several other European states, favored a narrower ban exempting therapeutic cloning. That group, many of which have active pharmaceutical and medical research communities, argued that the top U.N. priority should be to quickly ban cloning humans, leaving it to individual governments to decide whether -- and if so, how -- to regulate therapeutic cloning. They noted that the U.S. Congress was itself so deeply divided over stem cell research that it had so far failed to adopt legislation regulating it. But a partial ban "has never been a principle that we've been prepared to accept," U.S. Deputy Ambassador James Cunningham told reporters after the vote. Over the next two years, "we will use this time to continue to enlarge the body of international opinion that supports a total ban on human cloning," he added. Add A Comment

Copyright 1996 - 2003 Boomers International, All rights reserved.

FastCounter by LinkExchange


 

Internet
Resources
Boomers Index
Research Tools
Featured Sites
LOG IN
 
More
Features
NewsLetter
HOROSCOPES
About B.I.
More Articles
Vietnam Vets
Boomer History
Hippies Web Site
Politics 2000
Love Songs
Bmr Of The Month
Easy Listening
Elvis's Land
Boomer's Gifts
Where Are They
Business WebRing
Information and Fun
Weekly Articles
Serious Side of Life
Awards
Comments